Legal Opinion
Local 60, United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners v. National Labor Relations Board
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided April 17, 1961No. 68PublishedCited by 140 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Douglas
Petitioner, United Brotherhood, entered into a contract with Mechanical Handling Systems, Inc. (which we will call the Company), whereby the Company agreed to work the hours, pay the wages, abide by the rules and regulations of the union applicable to the locality where the work is done, and employ members of the union.
The Company, undertaking work at Indianapolis, agreed to hire workers on referral from a local union, one of the petitioners in this case. Two applicants from another local union were denied employment by the Company because they could not get referral from petitioner local…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Phelps Dodge Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Radio Officers' Union of the Commercial Telegraphers Union v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Virginia Electric & Power Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Republic Steel Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by140 opinions
- Franks v. Bowman Transportation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
- International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers v. FoustSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- National Labor Relations Board v. Haberman Construction CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- National Labor Relations Board v. Flomatic CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
135 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.