Legal Opinion

Smith v. Behr Process Corp.

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided September 13, 2002No. 25670-3-IIPublishedCited by 74 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

54 P.3d 665 (2002)

113 Wash.App. 306

Deborah and Randall SMITH, Russell and Janyce Taylor, Russell and Eulala Shute, Clay and Lynn Westby, and Richard L. Johnson and Jay Johnson, Mark and Tamara Feeser, Scott and Kristine Tomlin, Scott and Judy Heiner, Mike and Connie Stullick, individually and on behalf of all individuals and entities similarly situated, Respondents/Cross Appellants,

v.

BEHR PROCESS CORPORATION, a foreign corporation, Appellants/Cross Respondents.

No. 25670-3-II.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2.

September 13, 2002.

Fredric Tausend, Theodore J. Angelis, Helen Bergman…

2Cases cited57 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Armstrong v. ManzoSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Credit Lyonnais Securities (Usa), Inc. v. Rafael Alcantara and Cavelba, S.A., Doing Business as Casa De Bolsa Rafael Alcantara V.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
  4. Cowiche Canyon Conservancy v. BosleyWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Blackie v. BarrackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by74 opinions

  1. Mayer v. Sto Industries, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Mayer v. Sto Industries, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Scott v. Cingular WirelessWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Berryman v. MetcalfCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  5. In Re West Virginia Rezulin LitigationWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2003

69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API