Legal Opinion
Rich v. Mezzetti
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided February 7, 1949PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSpalding, J.
This is an action by a broker to recover a commission. The jury could have found these facts: The defendant was the owner of certain bowling alleys on Quincy Shore Boulevard. Sometime in August or September, 1944, the plaintiff, who sold bowling alley supplies and equipment, had a conversation with the defendant concerning the sale of these alleys. In that conversation, according to the plaintiff's version of it, the defendant told the plaintiff that he wanted to “get rid” of his bowling alleys. The plaintiff said, “Why don’t you let me sell one *670of the alleys on the Drive?” and the defendant…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Munroe v. TaylorMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
- Cohen v. AmesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
- Noyes v. CaldwellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
- Chapin v. RubyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
- Pagum v. WhiteMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Gaynor v. LaverdureMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
- Shaw v. United Cape Cod Cranberry Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1955
- Alphen v. Bryant's Market, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1952
- Chelmsford Colonial Real Estate Co. v. ForrestMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1976
- Palmer Russell Co. v. SalahMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1951
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.