Shaw v. United Cape Cod Cranberry Co.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtQua, C.J.
By this bill the plaintiffs, husband and wife, seek an accounting by the defendant of sums claimed to be due from the defendant to the plaintiffs in accordance with a sealed contract entered into between the parties under date of November 17, 1939. By amendment with the consent of the defendant there was added a claim for a “commission” or, as otherwise expressed, for “the fair value of . . . services” alleged to be due to the husband or to the husband and wife jointly for procuring a purchaser for the “Starr” bog, owned by the defendant. This last mentioned claim has been treated by both…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Minot v. MinotMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
- MacLeod v. DavisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Cook v. ScheffreenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
- Morin v. ClarkMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
- Munroe v. TaylorMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Entrialgo v. Twin City Dodge, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
- Michelson v. AronsonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1976
- New England Overall Co. Inc. v. WoltmannMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1961
- Miller v. WinshallMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1980
- Dynamics Research Corp. v. Analytic Sciences Corp.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1980
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.