Legal Opinion

Continental Casualty Co. v. Didier

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 22, 1990No. 89-339PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

David Newbern, Justice.

This appeal questions whether there was a sufficient factual basis to support the chancellor’s decision to reform an instrument evidencing an insurance contract. Also at issue is the insurer’s claim for a declaratory judgment to the effect that the policy, due to an exclusionary clause, did not cover liability which might arise because of the unlawful sale of alcoholic beverages. The chancellor granted reformation on the ground of unilateral mistake of the insured coupled with inequitable conduct on the part of the insurer. The effect of the reformation was to remove…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Carr v. TurnerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1965
  2. Continental Casualty Company v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1971
  3. Fowler v. Unionaid Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929
  4. Mercury Insurance v. McClellanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1950
  5. Arnett v. LillardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1969

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Ann Langley, as Mother and Next Friend of Tamara Langley, a Minor v. Allstate Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
  2. Martin v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  3. Silverball Amusement, Inc. v. Utah Home Fire InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1994
  4. Mans v. Peoples Bank of ImbodenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  5. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance v. CravenCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2002

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API