Rockers v. Kansas Turnpike Authority
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Larson, J.:
This appeal requires us to decide whether the Kansas Turnpike Authority (KTA) is a municipality upon which a notice of claim must be served pursuant to K.S.A. 12-105b(d). If the KTA is not a municipality and a notice of claim was not required, the statute of limitations has expired on Dana R. Rockers’ petition unless the KTA is equitably estopped from utilizing this affirmative defense.
Facts
The KTA terminated Rockers’ employment on December 4, 1992. Three days prior to the expiration of the 2-year statute of limitation under K.S.A.…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Gillespie v. SeymourSupreme Court of Kansas · 1991
- Kansas Public Employees Retirement System v. Reimer & Koger Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1997
- Bowen v. WesterhausSupreme Court of Kansas · 1978
- Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. CarrSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
- United American State Bank v. Wild West Chrysler Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1977
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- PCTV Gold, Inc. v. SPEEDNET, LLC.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
- Hallam v. Mercy Health Center of Manhattan, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2004
- CHELF v. StateCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2011
- Fleetwood Enterprises, Inc. v. Coleman Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2007
- Doe v. PopravakCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2017
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.