Legal Opinion

Doe v. Popravak

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided June 9, 2017No. 115,282PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Leben, J.:

*763The plaintiff in this case, who has filed under the pseudonym John F.M. Doe, says that he was abused in 1972-when he was 11 years old-by a Catholic priest. Four decades later, when Doe was 53, he filed a lawsuit seeking damages for the abuse. The district court dismissed Doe's claims after it concluded that it was too late under Kansas law for him to pursue them. Doe has appealed to our court.

We will begin our overview of the issues of this case and this decision with the two different types of time limitations that prevent claims from being litigated. One is a statute of…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. State v. GodfreySupreme Court of Kansas · 2015
  2. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
  3. Harding v. K.C. Wall Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1992
  4. Friends University v. W. R. Grace & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1980
  5. Yao-Wen Chang v. Baxter Healthcare Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Bertels v. Farm Bureau Property & Casualty Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2024
  2. Delaware Township v. City of Lansing, KansasSupreme Court of Kansas · 2022
  3. Black v. Union Pacific Railroad CompanyDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2024
  4. CoreFirst Bank & TrustCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2020
  5. Ellsworth William Jeffries III, et al. v. Harcros Chemicals Inc., et al.District Court, D. Kansas · 2026

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API