Legal Opinion

Myers v. Industrial Accident Commission

California Supreme Court

Decided August 23, 1923No. S. F. No. 10508PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWaste, J.

The petitioner seeks in this proceeding to annul the action of the Industrial Accident Commission in awarding compensation to Joseph G. Renteria for injuries found by the respondent to have been sustained by the employee in the course of and -arising out of his employment at the winery of the petitioner near Livermore. While working about a vat of boiling sherry wine, Renteria was severely burned by an explosion caused by alcoholic fumes from the vat becoming ignited from a lighted candle which Renteria was using in his work.

The petitioner contends that there is no evidence in the record…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Great Western Power Co. v. PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Dearborn v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Engels Copper Mining Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  4. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Leadbettor v. Indus. Accident Comm'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. People v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Braewood Convalescent Hospital v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Healy v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  4. County of San Bernardino v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Findley v. FlaniganIdaho Supreme Court · 1962

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API