Legal Opinion

Findley v. Flanigan

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided July 27, 1962No. 9130PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Chief Justice.

Claimant-appellant is hereinafter designated as claimant. Respondent employer is hereinafter sometimes referred to as the Company, and the Industrial Accident Board as the Board.

The crucial issues involved on this appeal are whether claimant timely notified his statutory employer, respondent A & B Cedar Company; or whether such employer had timely knowledge of an accident which occurred on December 2, 1960, and *476of claimant’s resultant industrial injury, and whether the Company’s rights were prejudiced. The Board, having resolved the issues against claimant, denied him…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Merrill v. Duffy Reed Construction Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Pinson Ex Rel. Pinson v. Minidoka Highway DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Miller v. Bingham CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Laub v. Meyer, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Myers v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Tucker v. Union Oil Co. of CaliforniaIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Christensen v. WestIdaho Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Taylor v. Soran Restaurant, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Murray-Donahue v. National Car Rental Licensee Ass'nIdaho Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Troutner v. Traffic Control CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1976

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API