Leadbettor v. Indus. Accident Comm'n
California Supreme Court
PROCEEDING- in Certiorari originally instituted in the Supreme Court to review an award of the Industrial Accident Commission. Award annulled. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.
Certiorari to review an award of the Industrial Accident Commission. The- applicant, Prank G-. Pryor, was a bridge carpenter, employed by the petitioner, Leadbettor. On July 22, 1916, he was working at Hermosa Beach. Pryor and a number of other men were handling a heavy “bent,” made of steel, when the bent settled down, crushing Pryor to the ground and resting upon his back. An injury to the ninth dorsal vertebra resulted.
One of the points made by the petitioners, Leadbettor and his insurance carrier, is that the applicant failed to give timely notice of his injury, as required by section 20…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- City of Milwaukee v. MillerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
- Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance v. PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Smith v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
3Cited by9 opinions
- Healy v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- McCoy v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- Myers v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Swift & Co. v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
- McLean v. Eaton Manfg. Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1938
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.