Legal Opinion

Carlsen v. State

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 17, 1935No. 29439PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDay, J.

This is an appeal from an order of the Lancaster county-court denying an application for a writ of error coram nobis. Carlsen was tried before and convicted by a jury in the district court of the crime of forgery. A motion for a new trial was overruled, and he was sentenced to the penitentiary and to pay a fine. He prosecuted a proceeding in error to this court, the result of which was an affirmance of the judgment. Carlsen v. State, 127 Neb. 11. He then applied to the supreme court of the United States for a writ of certiorari, which was denied. Thereafter he made application to the trial…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Mooney v. HolohanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Sanders v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  3. State v. CalhounSupreme Court of Kansas · 1893
  4. State Ex Rel. Lopez v. KilligrewIndiana Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Dodge v. PeopleNebraska Supreme Court · 1876

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Ex Parte HawkSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Jackson v. OlsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Parker v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1957
  4. State v. El-TabechNebraska Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Hawk v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1949

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API