Legal Opinion
Thomas v. District of Columbia
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided May 24, 1960No. 2509-2511PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOOD, Associate Judge.
Appellant was charged with vagrancy in three separate informations. 1 The first, filed January 26, 1959, charged vagrancy during the period August 27, 1958, to January 26, 1959; the second, filed March 21, 1959, charged the offense from February 3 to March 21, 1959; and the third, filed June 13, 1959, covered the period from April 3 to June 13, 1959. The three charges were tried in succession and appellant was found guilty on each information.
On these appeals appellant does not question the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain a conviction of vagrancy, but contends…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Horning v. District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- State v. . JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
- Savage v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1947
- Ellingham v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1932
- State v. WoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hicks v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1964
- Mayle v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1961
- District of Columbia v. KingDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1964
- People v. Serrano PagánSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1962
- Pueblo v. Serrano PagánSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1962