Legal Opinion

Kaufman v. Bartels

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided June 29, 1944PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum Per Cotriaon.

The exchange of telegrams did not effect a renewal of the pre-existing lease (Pomeroy v. Newell No. 2, 117 App. Div. 800, 804; Slagel v. Huff, 166 Misc. 168, 171, affd. 254 App. Div. 925, motion for leave to appeal denied 279 N. Y. 813). The tenant, by retaining possession after expiration of the lease, is deemed to have agreed to the landlord’s terms as expressed in the proposed renewal lease (McKee v. Fredke. Loeser & Co., Inc., No. 66, April, 1932, Term), and consequently the landlord was under no obligation to comply with the provisions of the original lease with…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pomeroy v. NewellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
  2. Slagel v. HuffNew York Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Slagel v. HuffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Harrison v. BerkowitzCity of New York Municipal Court · 1951
  2. South Carolina Leasing Co. v. AllenAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1961
  3. Reimer v. KaslovCivil Court of the City of New York · 1970
  4. Fordham Hill, Associates v. GelbertCity of New York Municipal Court · 1957
  5. Ungar v. SchwartzNassau County District Court · 1961

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API