Slagel v. Huff
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMaloney, J.
Defendant moves on the pleadings in the above-entitled action for an order granting judgment dismissing plaintiff’s complaint on the ground that said complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. Such relief is demanded under and by virtue of rule 112 of the Rules of Civil Practice.
Plaintiff’s complaint alleges that by written lease dated May 13, 1933, plaintiff leased to defendant a certain apartment for the term of eleven months from June 1, 1933, to May 1, 1934, for the sum of $1,650, payable in monthly installments of $150 each. Defendant entered into and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Braxton v. . MendelsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
- Brady v. . CassidyNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
- Richardson v. GregoryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927
- Richardson v. GregoryNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
- Germini v. New York Central RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Kaufman v. BartelsAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1944
- Slagel v. HuffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938