Legal Opinion
South Carolina Leasing Co. v. Allen
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided January 25, 1961PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curimn,
The housing accommodations here involved are not subject to the emergency rent control laws. By remaining in possession after the expiration of his lease, tenant is deemed to have assented to the increased rental fixed by landlord in the notice sent before the lease expired. (Kaufman v. Bartels, 182 Misc. 128, motion for leave to appeal denied 268 App. Div. 864; Fordham Hill Associates v. Fiebach, 21 Misc 2d 277.) There is no requirement that such notice be annexed to the petition or that it be served in the same manner as a precept in a summary proceeding. (V. G. C. Realty Corp.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Fordham Hill Associates v. FiebachAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1959
- Kaufman v. BartelsAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1944
3Cited by7 opinions
- Rita Knitting Mills, Inc. v. SeidlerCivil Court of the City of New York · 1963
- Aronson v. MarkulinCivil Court of the City of New York · 1963
- Lantz v. MetaxasCivil Court of the City of New York · 1965
- Reimer v. KaslovCivil Court of the City of New York · 1970
- Joffe v. Drake Business School, Inc.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1962
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.