Legal Opinion

Ungar v. Schwartz

Nassau County District Court

Decided April 11, 1961PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBernard Tomson, J.

This action illustrates the murky relationship between the paramount landlord and his subtenant, which often follows the cancellation of the paramount lease. The complaint seeks to recover rent which the landlord urges is due because the defendant did not vacate the premises on a day set in a notice. The notice stated that the failure to vacate would result in a tenancy for a year at increased rental.

On September 9, 1960, the paramount landlord (the plaintiffs here), in a summary proceeding, recovered possession of the apartment house where the defendant was a subtenant but was not made a…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Despard v. . WalbridgeNew York Court of Appeals · 1857
  2. Geist v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1956
  3. Christatos v. United Cigar Stores Co. of AmericaAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1932
  4. City of New York v. FinkNew York Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Gasoff Realty Corp. v. BergerNew York Supreme Court · 1947

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Clukies v. WrightNew York District Court · 1964
  2. Turf Screen Printers, Inc. v. GrayNew York Supreme Court · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API