Legal Opinion

State v. Easton

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 23, 2014No. C110669CR, C102366CR; A149728, A149729PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOrtega, P. J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction for unlawful possession of methamphetamine, ORS 475.894, and a judgment finding him in violation of his probation for committing that offense. He assigns error to the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence discovered when officers detained him without a warrant. We conclude that, on the facts presented, officer safety concerns did not justify the actions the officers took to seize defendant without a warrant and that, but for that seizure, the officers would not inevitably have discovered the evidence at issue. Accordingly, we…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. EhlyOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. BatesOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  3. State v. ZumbrumCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  4. State v. HannaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  5. State v. BentzCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  2. State v. ReichCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API