In Re Berwyn E. Etter
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
*854MARKEY, Chief Judge.
Appeal from a decision of the Board of Appeals (board) of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) affirming the examiner’s final rejection in a reexamination proceeding of claims 1 through 9, all of the claims of United States Patent No. 4,133,034 (the ’034 patent), issued January 2, 1979 to Berwyn E. Etter, as nonpatenta-ble under 35 U.S.C. § 103 in view of prior art. We affirm.
Background
The ’034 patent concerns a method and device for assimilating utility meter data at meter locations. Anthony Goodfellow, who had applied for and been refused a license under…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Stratoflex, Inc. v. Aeroquip CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- In Re Yujiro Yamamoto, and Dictaphone Corp., IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Application of Charles D. Prater and James WeiCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969
- Orthopedic Equipment Company, Inc., and Marriott Corporation, and Cross-Appellees v. The United States, and Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- In Re Frank N. Piasecki and Donald N. MeyersCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by97 opinions
- Sri International v. Matsushita Electric Corporation of America and Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Constant v. Advanced Micro-Devices, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Ethicon, Inc. v. Donald J. Quigg, Commissioner of Patents & Trademarks and the United States Patent & Trademark OfficeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Henry Hendler, Paul Garrett, Tillie Goldring, as Trustees, and Henry Hendler and Irving Gronsky v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- In Re David C. PaulsenCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
92 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.