Legal Opinion
Amalgamated Transit Union International, Afl-Cio v. Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of Labor
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided September 24, 1985No. 84-5159PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court PER CURIAM.
2Per curiam
The Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority (“MARTA”) moves for leave to intervene in this case. This motion comes to us more than four months after this court heard oral argument and almost two months after we reversed the judgment of the court below. Because MARTA’s request does not present an exceptional case involving imperative reasons justifying intervention at this late stage, we deny the motion to intervene.
The Secretary of Labor refused to deny certification to MARTA under section 13(c) of the Urban Mass Transportation Act of 1964, 49 U.S.C. app.…
3Cases cited9 opinions
- Landreth Timber Co. v. LandrethSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers, Local 283 v. ScofieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Holt v. Alleghany Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Amalgamated Transit Union International, Afl-Cio v. Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
- Alleghany Corp. v. KirbyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by11 opinions
- Hutchinson v. PfeilCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- State Ex Rel. Ball v. CummingsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2000
- Edward Peruta v. County of San DiegoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Humane Society of the United States v. AGRI [ORDER IN SLIP OPINION FORMAT]Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2022
- Edward Peruta v. County of San DiegoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.