Ellis v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWalter, J.
Motion for reargument brought on without permission is denied, with $10 costs, payable by the moving attorneys personally. Whether or not there should be a reargument is within the discretion of the judge who decided the motion and the Bar should understand by this time that leave of that judge to make the motion should first be obtained (1 Carmody on New York Practice, § 394; New York Central R. R. Co. v. Beacon Milling Co., 184 Misc. 187, 191; Sheehan v. Carvalho, 12 App. Div. 430). The proper practice is to submit to the judge who decided the motion a short affidavit setting forth the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. . PatrickNew York Court of Appeals · 1905
- New York Central Railroad v. Beacon Milling Co.New York Supreme Court · 1945
- Sheehan v. CarvalhoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
3Cited by8 opinions
- American Trading Co. v. FishNew York Supreme Court · 1975
- People v. JenkinsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972
- De Windt v. O'LearyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1954
- Mulder v. A.S. Goldman & Co.New York Supreme Court · 1999
- Sorin v. Shahmoon Industries, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1962
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.