Legal Opinion

Sorin v. Shahmoon Industries, Inc.

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 20, 1962PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMatthew M. Levy, J.

The plaintiffs in the present derivative stockholders’ action have heretofore been ordered to post security for expenses, pursuant to section 61-b of the General Corporation Law (30 Mise 2d 429). They now move for reargument. They urge that I overlooked my prior decision after trial requiring the defendants to account (30 Mise 2d 408, 422 et seq.). They argue that the corporation can be entitled to security only where it may become liable to other parties for expenses pursuant to section 64, and that, in the present case, no such liability will be possible since the defendants have, after…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sorin v. Shahmoon Industries, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Ellis v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.New York Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Perry v. Shahmoon Industries, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Bankers Commercial Corp. v. American Home Assurance Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1959

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. American Trading Co. v. FishNew York Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Rubin v. DondyshCivil Court of the City of New York · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API