Legal Opinion
Mulder v. A.S. Goldman & Co.
New York Supreme Court
Decided December 8, 1999PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Louise Gruner Gans, J.
Petitioners Robert and Suzanne Mulder move, pursuant to CPLR 2221, for leave to reargue respondents’ motion to vacate and, upon reargument, vacating the court’s June 30, 1999 order and reinstating the December 18, 1998 order of attachment in the amount of $200,000.
This motion involves the interaction of procedures concerning commencement of an arbitration and a special proceeding to aid the arbitration. This interaction yields the following questions:
Whether petitioner is required to file with the County Clerk its notice of claim when it obtains an…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Beckman v. Greentree Securities, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1996
- Cooper v. Ateliers de la Motobecane, S. A.New York Court of Appeals · 1982
- 300 West Realty Co. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Ellis v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.New York Supreme Court · 1951
- Katz v. ListonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Moreta v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Sierra USA Communications, Inc. v. International Telephone & Satellite Corp.New York Supreme Court · 2006