Legal Opinion

Abbott v. Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis LLP

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County

Decided February 28, 2001No. 1825Published

1Opinion of the Court

HERRON, J.,

This case presents the narrow issue of whether active partners may retroactively modify retirement benefits pursuant to a general amendment provision in their partnership agreement to the detriment of retired partners who had completed the requisite years of service and were receiving retirement compensation under the agreement. This issue is framed by cross-motions for summary judgment of the plaintiffs, retired partners Frank H. Abbott and Vincent P. Haley, and defendant law firm Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis LLP.1 For the reasons set forth below, the plain*227tiffs’ motion on…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. United States Railroad Retirement Board v. FritzSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Lynch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. Allied Structural Steel Co. v. SpannausSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Robert D. Sprague, Plaintiffs-Appellees/cross-Appellants v. General Motors Corporation, Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
  5. Corestates Bank, N.A. v. CutilloSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API