Legal Opinion

LaSalle Extension University v. Kronewitter

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 29, 1949No. 17,910PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoyse, J.

This is an attempt to appeal from a judgment of the St. Joseph Superior Court No. 1. The assignment of errors here is as follows:

“1. Court’s decision is not sustained by sufficient evidence;
“2. Court’s decision is contrary to law.”

Appellee has filed his motion to affirm the judgment on the grounds that no question has been presented by the above assignment of errors. The motion will have to be sustained. Burns’ 1946 Replacement, § 2-2401; Van Buskirk et al. v. Stover (1904), 162 Ind. 448, 70 N. E. 520; Zimmerman v. Gaumer et al. (1899), 152 Ind. 552, 555, 53 N. E. 829.

Judgment affirmed.

Note.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Zimmerman v. GaumerIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Van Buskirk v. StoverIndiana Supreme Court · 1904

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Deckard v. Indiana State School Building AuthorityIndiana Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Parliament v. TaberIndiana Court of Appeals · 1951
  3. Harlos v. CurrieIndiana Court of Appeals · 1951
  4. Stutz v. Used Car Loan Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API