Stutz v. Used Car Loan Co.

The assignments of error in this case are as follows:

“1. The Court erred at the conclusion of the testimony of the appellee and after it had rested in overruling the motion of the appellant for a directed judgment.

“2. The Court erred in its judgment that the appellee recover from the appellant the sum of two hundred twenty-five ($225.00) dollars damages, with costs, and the possession of one Lincoln Sedan Automobile Zephyr, Model 73, year 1939, Motor No. H-75500.

“3.. The Court erred in decreeing a judgment for two hundred twenty-five ($225.00) dollars and costs against appellant.

“4. The Court…