Deckard v. Indiana State School Building Authority
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDraper, C. J.
The assignment of errors in this case contains but one specification. It reads as follows:
“The decision of the trial court is contrary to law.”
This specification may properly be made as a ground for new trial. Burns’ 1946 Repl., §2-2401(6). When so specified it may be presented to this court by an assignment that the trial court erred in overruling the motion for new trial. It may not be independently assigned as error and when such is done no question is thereby presented to this court, and the judgment will be affirmed. Doss v. Yingling (1933), 204 Ind. 571, 185 N. E. 281; Migatz v.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Migatz v. StieglitzIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
- Greenwell v. CunninghamIndiana Court of Appeals · 1948
- Better Taste Popcorn Co. v. DrakeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1952
- LaSalle Extension University v. KronewitterIndiana Court of Appeals · 1949
- Doss v. YinglingIndiana Supreme Court · 1933
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Watson v. WatsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1957
- Ramey v. UrbanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1967
- Ostric v. St. Mary's CollegeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1972
- Ostric v. St. Mary's CollegeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1972