Harlos v. Currie

This is an action brought by appellant against appellees on an account and to foreclose a materialman’s lien. Judgment was rendered for appellant upon his complaint.

The sole assignment of errors made by appellant in this cause is: “The finding of the Court is contrary to law.”

Appellees filed a motion to dismiss the appeal, contending, among other things, that the assignment of errors presents no question for our determination. Rule 2-6 provides that, “Amendments may be permitted upon such terms as the court shall direct.” Although the appellant’s attention has been directed to the…