Legal Opinion

Winebrenner v. Salmon

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided July 16, 1928No. [No. 51, April Term, 1928.]PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdkiks, J.

By Article 16 of the Constitution of Maryland, known as “The Referendum,” the people reserved to themselves power by petition to have submitted to the registered voters of tho state, to approve or reject at the polls, any act or part of any act of the General Assembly, if approved by the Governor, or, if passed by the General Assembly over the veto of the Governor. The method of accomplishing this is by a petition signed by the designated number of votes, or percentage (depending upon whether the act to be submitted is a general or a local law), the petition to be filed before the first day…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People ex rel. McCauley & Tevis v. BrooksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  2. State ex rel. Blakeslee v. ClausenWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Bonsal v. YellottCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1905
  4. Huffman v. State Roads CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1927
  5. Graham v. WellingtonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1913

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Kelly v. Marylanders for Sports Sanity, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
  2. Maryland Action for Foster Children, Inc. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  3. Dorsey v. PetrottCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1940
  4. Bayne v. Secretary of StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
  5. Bickel v. NiceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1937

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API