Legal Opinion

Bayne v. Secretary of State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided October 9, 1978No. [No. 37, September Term, 1978.]PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOrth, J.

This case concerns the interplay between two amendments to the Constitution of Maryland made within a year of each other more than sixty years past. One, proposed by Acts 1914, ch. 673 and ratified at the election of 2 November 1915, added art. XVI and created “The Referendum.” The other, the “budget amendment,” proposed by Acts 1916, ch. 159 and ratified at the 1916 election, added § 52 to art. Ill and established a comprehensive executive budget system for the State of Maryland, including the requirement that “[e]very appropriation bill shall be either a Budget Bill, or a Supplementary…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Whalen v. RoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Maher v. RoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Beal v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Busser v. SnyderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Judy v. SchaeferCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  2. Kindley v. Governor of MarylandCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
  3. South Dakota Education Association/ NEA Ex Rel. Roberts v. BarnettSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Kelly v. Marylanders for Sports Sanity, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
  5. Philip Morris Inc. v. GlendeningCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API