Bayne v. Secretary of State
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtOrth, J.
This case concerns the interplay between two amendments to the Constitution of Maryland made within a year of each other more than sixty years past. One, proposed by Acts 1914, ch. 673 and ratified at the election of 2 November 1915, added art. XVI and created “The Referendum.” The other, the “budget amendment,” proposed by Acts 1916, ch. 159 and ratified at the 1916 election, added § 52 to art. Ill and established a comprehensive executive budget system for the State of Maryland, including the requirement that “[e]very appropriation bill shall be either a Budget Bill, or a Supplementary…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Whalen v. RoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Maher v. RoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Beal v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Busser v. SnyderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Judy v. SchaeferCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
- Kindley v. Governor of MarylandCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
- South Dakota Education Association/ NEA Ex Rel. Roberts v. BarnettSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- Kelly v. Marylanders for Sports Sanity, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
- Philip Morris Inc. v. GlendeningCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.