Legal Opinion
Hoffman v. United Telecommunications, Inc.
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided March 28, 1986No. Civ. A. No. 76-223-C2PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
GERALD L. RUSHFELT, United States Magistrate.
Under consideration are plaintiff and plaintiff-intervenor’s Motion for Leave to Communicate with Potential Claimants (doc. 636) and defendants’ Motion for Protective Order (doc. 657).
Plaintiff and plaintiff-intervenor (hereinafter plaintiffs) seek leave to communicate with all current employees, former employees, and applicants for employment of defendants by way of letter and questionnaire. (Exhibit A, attached to doc. 636.) Plaintiffs contend they need to communicate with these individuals before any finding of liability, in…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- General Telephone Co. of the Northwest, Inc. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Gulf Oil Co. v. BernardSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Jacqueline M. Harris, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Intervenor-Appellant v. Amoco Production Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
- Dolan v. Project Construction Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Singer Controls Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1978
3Cited by2 opinions
- Cox Nuclear Medicine v. Gold Cup Coffee Services, Inc.District Court, S.D. Alabama · 2003
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Mitsubishi Motor Manufacturing of America, Inc.District Court, C.D. Illinois · 1997