Legal Opinion
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Mitsubishi Motor Manufacturing of America, Inc.
District Court, C.D. Illinois
Decided March 24, 1997No. 96-1192PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
McDADE, District Judge.
Before the Court are Defendant’s Objections to the EEOC’s Third Proposed Letter to Mitsubishi Employees and Motion to Enforce Scheduling Order [Doe. # 51]. This is just the latest chapter in an ongoing war between the parties regarding proposed communications to the alleged victims of sexual harassment. A brief history of this dispute is in order.
BACKGROUND
On September 13, 1996, Plaintiff EEOC sent a form letter to all current and former female associates of Defendant Mitsubishi which stated in relevant part: “You should know that you are not required to discuss…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- General Telephone Co. of the Northwest, Inc. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Gulf Oil Co. v. BernardSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Zarate v. YoungloveDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1980
- 72 Fair empl.prac.cas. (Bna) 1130, 69 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 44,448 Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Mitsubishi Motor Manufacturing of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- Hoffman v. United Telecommunications, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1986
3Cited by2 opinions
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Morgan Stanley & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Crain Automotive Holdings, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 2024