Rahn v. Searchlight Mercantile Co.

The stipulation was not binding because:

1. The authority of Guy E. Baker was limited and subject to the direction and supervision of W.H. Metson, as directing attorney.

2. The execution and filing of the stipulation was never authorized nor directed, either generally or specially by said W.H. Metson, said defendant, Louis Rahn, nor any other person.

3. On the contrary, three days prior to the execution of said stipulation said Guy E. Baker was expressly instructed by said W.H. Metson not to make an appearance in said action on behalf of said defendant, Louis Rahn, for the reason said W.H.…