Legal Opinion
Fritz Hansen A/S v. Eighth Judicial District Court of Nevada
Nevada Supreme Court
Decided August 21, 2000No. 35252PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
This is an original petition for a writ of prohibition challenging a district court order that denied a motion to quash service of process for lack of personal jurisdiction. Petitioner has filed a motion for a stay of the district court proceedings pending resolution of the petition so that it will not be forced to risk making a general appearance by answering the complaint filed against it. We conclude that the special/general appearance doctrine should be abrogated in light of the 1998 amendments to NRCP 12(b) and several recent decisions of this court, and that a stay is not…
3Cases cited24 opinions
- Virginia Petroleum Jobbers Ass'n v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958
- David R. Ruiz, United States of America, Intervenor-Appellee v. W. J. Estelle, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Orange Theatre Corp. v. Rayherstz Amusement Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1944
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. Walter Wencke, Theodore Delusignan, Movant-Appellant v. R.N. Gould, Receiver-TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Trump v. Eighth Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 1993
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by20 opinions
- Ogawa v. OgawaNevada Supreme Court · 2009
- United States v. SteinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- Knutson v. Allis-Chalmers Corp.District Court, D. Nevada · 2005
- Dogra v. LilesNevada Supreme Court · 2013
- Tricarichi v. Cooperative Rabobank, U.A.Nevada Supreme Court · 2019
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.