Legal Opinion
Bassick Mfg. Co. v. Adams Grease Gun Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided July 14, 1931No. 142, 143PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SWAN, Circuit Judge.
The three patents in suit relate to lubricating apparatus which lias come into very extensive use in the greasing of machine bearings, particularly those of automobiles. Speaking broadly, the apparatus consists of a compressor or “grease gun” adapted to force grease through a flexible hose attached thereto, a coupling device at the end of such hose, and a grease cup or fitting, adapted to be permanently located in proximity to a bearing, to which the coupler may be attached when the bearing is to be lubricated. The claims of the patents in suit are for combinations of the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Motion Picture Patents Co. v. Universal Film Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Carbice Corp. of America v. American Patents Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Leeds & Catlin Company v. Victor Talking Machine Company (No. 2)Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Ensten v. Simon, Ascher & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Lyman Mfg. Co. v. Bassick Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1927
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Denominational Envelope Co. v. Duplex Envelope Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1935
- R. M. Hollingshead Co. v. Bassick Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1934
- Gillette Safety Razor Co. v. Standard Safety Razor Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933
- Otis Elevator Co. v. Pacific Finance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1934
- General Chemical Co. v. Standard Wholesale Phosphate & Acid Works, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1935
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.