Legal Opinion

Erickson v. Van Web Equipment Company

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 29, 1965No. 39353PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Nelson, Justice.

This action was brought by plaintiff to recover damages for the loss of part of the fingers of his left hand in an accident which occurred October 25, 1960, while he was using a hydraulic hoist on a farm owned by defendants Harold and Arthur Quarstad. Also named as a defendant was Van Web Equipment Company, which plaintiff claimed had designed and manufactured the hoist, but the action was dismissed as to this defendant at the close of plaintiff’s testimony.

At the time of the accident plaintiff was a farmer in Pilot Mound Township, near Chatfield, Minnesota, was 39 years of…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Rase v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
  2. Schmeling v. JorgensenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Anderson v. C. N. Nelson Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
  4. Geis v. HodgmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
  5. Syverson v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. City of Tucson v. HollidayCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
  2. Knutson v. Arrigoni Brothers Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
  3. Rausch v. Julius B. Nelson and Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
  4. Muckler v. BuchlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
  5. State v. MunnellCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API