Legal Opinion

Geis v. Hodgman

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 27, 1959No. 37,573PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Knutson, Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment entered in favor of plaintiff pursuant to a verdict rendered by a jury.'

Plaintiff, who was 56 years of age at the time of trial, had been employed as a housekeeper in the home of defendant for a number of years prior to the occurrence of the accident for which she here seeks to recover damages for personal injuries. Her duties were that of a housekeeper, and, among other things, she was required to go down to a mailbox to pick up the mail. Defendant’s home is located on a hill overlooking Lake Minnetonka. The only access to the home is over a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Rase v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
  2. Rothenberger v. Northwestern Consolidated Milling Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
  3. Suess v. Arrowhead Steel Products Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  4. Schlitz v. Pabst Brewing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
  5. Syverson v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Peterson v. WT Rawleigh CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
  2. Coenen v. Buckman Building CorporationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
  3. Knutson v. Arrigoni Brothers Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
  4. Rausch v. Julius B. Nelson and Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
  5. Hollinbeck v. DowneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API