Morehart v. Furley
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district.count for Blue Earth county to recover $2,831.55 and to have the court direct that a second mortgage be assigned to plaintiff in the •amount of the judgment. The case was tried before Com-stock, J., and a jury which returned a verdict in favor of plaintiff. From the judgment entered pursuant to the order for judgment, defendant appealed.
1Opinion of the Court
Taylor, C.
Plaintiff alleges in his complaint that he effected the sale of defendant’s farm in Blue Earth county, Minnesota, and -that defendant agreed to pay him a specified commission therefor. He also alleges that defendant agreed to secure this commission by a mortgage on the land, hut failed and refused to do so-; that defendant conveyed the land to the purchaser and took hack a second mortgage for a part of the purchase price; and that defendant is not a resident of the state of Minnesota, but resides in the-state of Nebraska, and has no property in the state of Minnesota except such…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Chandler v. Citizens National BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
- Shuffeldt v. JefcoatSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Thompson v. GreerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1901
- Linton v. HeyeNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
- Lower v. WilsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1896
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. RustSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
- Midwest Refining Co. v. GeorgeWyoming Supreme Court · 1929
- Federal-Hoffman, Inc. v. FacklerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
- Morehart v. FurleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
- Guy v. Dictating MacHine & Record Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.