Shroma H. Lang v. William L. Callahan
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
EUGENE A. WRIGHT, Circuit Judge:
Pro se appellant Shroma H. Lang, a black state prisoner, raises two issues in this appeal from the denial of his habeas corpus petition:
1) Was defense counsel constitutionally ineffective in stipulating to the admissibility of a tape-recording and transcript of a statement made by the victim? and
2) Was Lang denied due process or equal protection by allegedly racial remarks made by the sentencing judge?
Following our de novo review, we affirm.
BACKGROUND
Lang was arrested and charged with first-degree rape and first-degree robbery. At trial, the white female victim…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Tumey v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- In Re Murchison.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Nix v. WhitesideSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Charles Bainton Butcher v. J. Marquez, Superintendent, and Attorney General, State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Jose S. Chacon v. Tana WoodCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Richard Boyde v. Jill Brown, Warden of California State Prison at San QuentinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Hence v. SmithDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1999
- Sanchez v. HedgpethDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2010
- Spector v. DiazDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2015
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.