Legal Opinion
19 Perry Street, LLC v. Unionville Water Co.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided February 2, 2010No. SC 18344PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
NORCOTT, J.
The defendant, The Connecticut Water Company, 1 appeals 2 from the judgment of the trial court, which found that the defendant had breached its lease agreement (lease) with the plaintiff, 19 Perry Street, LLC, and ordered immediate possession of the leased premises in favor of the plaintiff. On appeal, the defendant claims that the trial court improperly: (1) interpreted paragraph five of the lease, as amended in 1990, as providing for cash payments as the only form of rent; (2) found that the defendant had breached the lease because it had failed to tender rent to any…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Dubay v. IrishSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- De La Concha of Hartford, Inc. v. Aetna Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- F. B. Fountain Co. v. SteinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1922
- Poole v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Mayron's Bake Shops, Inc. v. Arrow Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- District Lodge 26 v. United Technologies Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
- Murtha v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
- Fairchild Heights, Inc. v. DickalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2012
- State v. MartinezSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Connecticut National Bank v. Rehab AssociatesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.