Legal Opinion

People v. Hope

California Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 1882No. 10,772PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of conviction and from an order denying a new trial in the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. Freelon, J.

1Opinion of the Court

Sharpstein, J.:

The question presented by the first point in appellant’s brief, as we view it, does not differ materially from that upon which this Court passed in People v. Smith, 59 Cal. 365, and we are satisfied with the views therein expressed.

We do not think that the bare fact of a juror having visited, during the trial, the premises where it was alleged that the defendant had committed the crime of burglary, was a sufficient ground for discharging the jury. From the facts before us we are unable to see how the case of the defendant could possibly have been prejudiced thereby.

For the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. WintersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
  2. People v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Zibbell v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
  2. People v. TugwellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
  3. Starchman v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1896
  4. Wilkins v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1972
  5. People v. CourtneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1913

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API