Legal Opinion
Voicestream Minneapolis, Inc. v. RPC Properties, Inc.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided January 10, 2008No. A06-394PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MEYER, Justice.
Appellant RPC Properties, Inc. (RPC) brought a motion seeking enforcement of a settlement agreement with VoieeStream Minneapolis, Inc., d/b/a T-Mobile (T-Mobile). Although the district court granted RPC’s request for enforcement and for attorney fees related to the motion, it remained silent as to RPC’s request for damages allegedly arising out of T-Mobile’s delay in performing under the settlement agreement. RPC appealed, asking for an explicit ruling on damages, and the court of appeals concluded that silence was equivalent to a denial of the request. VoiceStream,…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Fabio v. BellomoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
- Ackra Direct Marketing Corp. And Michael Ackerman, Individually v. Fingerhut Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
- Dahlberg Brothers, Inc. v. Ford Motor CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
- Couveau v. American Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- M.H. v. Caritas Family ServicesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Boynes v. Transportation Services of St. John, Inc.Supreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2014
- BRIDGEWATER TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. v. City of MonticelloCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
- Hunter v. Anchor Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013
- Marlow Timberland, LLC v. County of LakeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- Metropolitan Sheet Metal Journeyman & Apprentice Training Trust Fund v. County of RamseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.