State v. Smith
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the Court
DELAHANTY, Justice.
Convicted of escape, 17 — A M.R.S.A. § 755, by a Knox County Superior Court jury for intentionally failing to return from furlough, the defendant, Clarence G. Smith, on appeal 1) attacks the sufficiency of the evidence and 2) asserts that certain conduct by the prison officials has denied him equal protection of the laws. Finding defendant’s arguments groundless, we deny the appeal.
I
The defendant’s only motion of record challenging the sufficiency of the evidence occurred at the conclusion of the State’s case. The motion was taken under advisement and was never ruled upon.…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Murch v. MottramSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- State v. PullenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1970
- United States v. Lawrence Lee Guinn, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
- United States v. William Hermann GodelCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1966
- John L. Sullivan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. WhiteSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
- State v. BoyerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
- State v. LandrySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
- State v. Van SickleSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
- State v. DoucetteSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.