Legal Opinion

Murch v. Mottram

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided November 6, 1972No. 72-55PublishedCited by 152 opinions

1Per curiam

Respondent Mottram sought habeas corpus from the United States District Court in Maine, challenging on various constitutional grounds the validity of a criminal conviction obtained in the Maine state courts. After a full evidentiary hearing, the District Court denied relief, both on the ground that respondent had deliberately bypassed state procedures established for the post-conviction adjudication of such claims, and on the ground that the *42constitutional claims were without merit. 330 F. Supp. 51 (1971). The Court of Appeals for the First-Circuit reversed, holding that respondent had not…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Sanders v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. State v. MottramSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1962
  4. Mottram v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1967
  5. Mottram v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1970

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by152 opinions

  1. State v. VanceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Commonwealth v. PisaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
  3. Emery v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
  4. Commonwealth v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. Commonwealth v. LayneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982

147 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API