Murch v. Mottram
Supreme Court of the United States
1Per curiam
Respondent Mottram sought habeas corpus from the United States District Court in Maine, challenging on various constitutional grounds the validity of a criminal conviction obtained in the Maine state courts. After a full evidentiary hearing, the District Court denied relief, both on the ground that respondent had deliberately bypassed state procedures established for the post-conviction adjudication of such claims, and on the ground that the *42constitutional claims were without merit. 330 F. Supp. 51 (1971). The Court of Appeals for the First-Circuit reversed, holding that respondent had not…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Sanders v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- State v. MottramSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1962
- Mottram v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1967
- Mottram v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1970
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by152 opinions
- State v. VanceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1980
- Commonwealth v. PisaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
- Emery v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
- Commonwealth v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Commonwealth v. LayneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
147 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.