Legal Opinion

State v. Boyer

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided October 13, 1978PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Per curiam

The defendant appeals from a judgment of the Superior Court, York County, finding him guilty, after a jury verdict, of attempted burglary, 17 — A M.R.S.A. §§ 152 and 401. The sole issue on appeal is whether the State introduced evidence sufficient to establish each element of the crime. We deny the appeal.

The defendant did not move for a judgment of acquittal at the close of all of the evidence, M.R.Crim.P. 29(a), or after verdict, M.R.Crim.P. 29(b), nor did he move for a new trial, M.R.Crim.P. 33. The defendant’s consequent failure to present the sufficiency issue to the presiding Justice…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. YorkSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1974
  2. State v. SmithSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
  3. State v. SmithSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
  4. State v. MaplesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1975

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. HowardSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
  2. State v. MahaneySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
  3. State v. GoyetteSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
  4. State v. CaouetteSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
  5. State v. Van SickleSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API