State v. Van Sickle

GODFREY, Justice.

Daniel Van Sickle appeals from a judgment of conviction after a jury trial, for trafficking in a schedule Z drug, marijuana, 1 in violation of 17-A M.R.S.A. § 1103 (1980) 2 entered by the Superior Court, Ken-nebec County. On appeal, Van Sickle, through different counsel, contends that the failure of his own counsel at trial to move for a new trial or for judgment of acquittal at the close of evidence or after the verdict created reversible error. He urges also that the evidence was insufficient to support the conviction. We deny the appeal.

The indictment and subsequent…