Legal Opinion
State v. Al-Naseer
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided April 27, 2004No. A03-634PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GORDON W. SHUMAKER, Judge.
On this appeal from a conviction for criminal vehicular homicide, appellant argues that (1) admission of a videotaped statement violated his constitutional rights because he invoked his right to remain silent and made unequivocal requests for an attorney; (2) the district court erred in admitting emotional “spark-of-life” evidence and in denying a motion for a mistrial after the prosecutor questioned the victim’s widow on her preclusion from attending the rest of the trial because of a sequestration order; (3) the district court erred in responding to jury…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Staples v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Smith v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. Al-NaseerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- State v. Al-NaseerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
- State v. Al-NaseerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- State v. Al-NaseerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
- State v. Al-NaseerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010