Legal Opinion

State v. Al-Naseer

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided September 26, 2006No. A05-1394PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OP I N I O N

ROSS, Judge.

This case concerns a tragic nighttime accident in which a car struck a person on Highway 10 near Glyndon in June 2002. Appellant Mohammed Al-Naseer challenges his conviction of vehicular homicide under Minn.Stat. § 609.21, subd. 1(7) (2000), arguing that a conviction based on leaving the scene of an accident causing the death of a person requires proof of his mens rea that he knew that the accident involved a person. Because we conclude that the district court erred by construing the statute to not impose the mens rea requirement that the driver knew or had reason to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. MurphySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
  2. State v. Al-NaseerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
  3. State v. Al-NaseerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. Al-NaseerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  2. State v. Al-NaseerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
  3. State v. Al-NaseerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API