Legal Opinion
Laningham v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided April 13, 1984No. 109-81CPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
REGINALD W. GIBSON, Judge:
This is a military pay case in which plaintiff, an officer in the United States Naval Reserve, seeks the reinstitution of certain disability pay and allowances. Entitlement to this relief emanates from an injury, allegedly sustained in an automobile accident on June 9, 1978, while plaintiff was serving on active duty for training. Jurisdiction in this court is premised on 28 U.S.C. § 1491 and other applicable statutes and regulations.
By his petition, filed on March 13, 1981, plaintiff demands all such pay and allowances in arrears from the date of his injury…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- Interstate Circuit, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Nader v. Allegheny Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. Munsey Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Browning Debenture Holders' Committee v. Dasa Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Freeman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Laningham v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1994
- Ulmet v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1989
- John R. Sand & Gravel Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
- Ulmet v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.