Gordon v. Hill
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtLandau, P. J.
Plaintiff petitioned for a writ of habeas corpus, asserting that he is being imprisoned unlawfully by defendant, the superintendent of the Eastern Oregon Correctional Institution. He asserts that the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision (board) erred in deferring his projected parole release date to August 15, 2001, based on a finding that he suffered from a present severe emotional disturbance such as to constitute a danger to the health and safety of the community. The trial court granted defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiffs petition. Plaintiff appeals. For the reasons set forth…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hamel v. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 2000
- Barth v. CliseSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Weidner v. ArmenakisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
- Merrill v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
- Peek v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Gordon v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionOregon Supreme Court · 2007
- Jones v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
- Washington v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015