Legal Opinion
Columbia Casualty Co. v. Hare, Et Vir.
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided July 30, 1934PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBuford, J.
The writ of error in this case is to review a judgment in favor of the defendants in error against the plaintiff in error.
These parties will be hereinafter referred to, the defendants in error as the plaintiffs, and the plaintiffs in error as the Surety Company.
John H. Bull Company, Inc., was a contractor performing certain alterations and repairs on a building known as the Equitable Building. Bridwell was alleged to be an independent contractor doing some work on the same buliding. While the work was in progress some pieces of stone or hard mortar fell from the building where joints were…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Washington Gas Light Co. v. District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Albany City Savings Institution v. . BurdickNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
- Village of Port Jervis v. . First National B'k.New York Court of Appeals · 1884
- George v. Employers' Liability Assur. CorporationSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
- Belden v. SeymourSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1831
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Ralph E. Coblentz, as Administrator, D.B.N. Of the Estate of Edward Thomas Coblentz, Deceased v. American Surety Company of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Arthur T. Stanton v. Everett P. LarshCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
- Anthony D. Duke v. Joel Hoch, Home Indemnity Company, Garnishee-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. JC Penney Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964
- Mid-Continent Casualty Co. v. Royal Crane, LLCDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.